| Subcribe via RSS

Why MBAs buy SLRs

June 25th, 2011 | 46 Comments | Posted in india, people, personal

Every MBA I know owns a digital SLR camera. And here is my theory that probably explains why.

So this is the story…

MBAs are a privileged lot. Even before you make it to an MBA college, you’re priveleged because you obviously got to study in good schools, got admitted into decent graduation colleges. In a country where most children don’t even make it to class 10, this is an extreme privilege. Getting into an MBA course was neither about the hard work you did during college nor was it about the awesome team player you were in that college festival you organized that nobody outside of nagpur cares about. Your being an MBA had to do with the hard work, the painful savings and the big sacrifices that your parents made. To a cut a long story short, you didn’t do anything great. But yes you’re an MBA and that means you’ve had a life far more privileged than others.

Unlike our parents, we MBAs didn’t get into professions where we had a specialization or a specific line of work.

In a country where the most privileged middle class workers aren’t really working on anything specific, or have no special nation/business building skills, it’s worrisome. And the MBAs are acutely aware of the sham that their jobs are and the uselessness of their existence in the system.

Where our parents were engineers who built things, we are an educated generation of engineers who decided to not build. Psychology grads who decided to sell soap.

Our generation’s desire to create, to express, to build isn’t dead. But the 60 hours that we work a week does not allow us to build and create. We only ‘manage’ what others create. And if a majority of the educated, well-fed, well-shod, articulate workforce can only be managers, who will build our nation? The millions who are being taught in dingy school classrooms with under-qualified teachers. Our creators are there. We are just managers. What a waste of an entire generation of possible creators.

So this is my theory… since our MBA education has not allowed us to be good at doing anything specific really, we have become a generation of people looking to be good at *something* at least. And this is when we pick our hobbies and ‘passions’. We want to write. We want to be photographers. Columnists. Editors. Directors. Actors. We want to be something.

Our DSLRs are not symbolic of the over-achievers that we are, as we’d have you believe.

Our DSLRs are a symbol of our crisis that we are not anything. That we don’t create. That we don’t do. And the worthlessness of our existence terrifies us. That’s why we buy our SLRs.

 

Share

Why the slutwalk is the worst thing to happen to the cause

June 20th, 2011 | 5 Comments | Posted in gender, india, personal, women

I recently came across this post by @mysti and having read a lot on the issue and having debated the slutwalk to death, I have just 3 arguments against it.

1. It alienates current victims

The slutwalk isn’t going to make any difference in India. There. I put it in writing. Men will not stop staring or touching, unasked. Women will not start fighting for their rights.

The women who will participate in the slutwalk are already the ones that speak up and fight. In order to further the cause, other women need to be encouraged. And they won’t be if you’re asking them to shed their clothes. A cause must be in sync with its victims. This one is more of a spectacle, giddily forgetting the hapless women who have a hard time even glaring back at the offender, much less shed their t-shirts in protest.

2. It will be seen as just a silly tantrum

A cause that is both serious and a social stigma, needs sensitivity and a powerful argument. The slutwalk is a tantrum. And like most tantrums, it will be either ignored or seen as a nuisance.

Is that what we want to do to a cause that traumatizes millions of women?

Is that what we want to do to women’s right to be respected?

I believe that this overzealous endeavour will harm more than it will benefit the cause. It alienates the cause, the shame, the unease, the ruthlessness of inequality. It makes it so easy to dismiss a serious cause. It makes it okay for a man to wave his hand and say ‘pagal ho gayin hain’. That is the danger. Sexual harassment is traumatic. Shedding our clothes and making a point against it sounds too much like a marketing tactic with complete disregard for the objective.

3. It takes too long a stretch to make the connection

In a world where it’s hard for a man to make the connection between ‘no’ and ‘need to stop touching her’, I think it’s laughable to expect him to think: Scantily clad women > slutwalk > to make it okay to wear what they want > to not touch or ogle > to be a nicer man

And with that I rest my case. Any debates are welcome.

Share